Weight toward the commercial tiers. Roughly a third on buying intent, a quarter on evaluation, a quarter on problem framing and the remainder split between definitional and branded is a reasonable starting distribution.
This is the pattern search followed, and there is no obvious reason for it to play out differently here. The advantage of early movement is not that the channel is large yet, it is that the positions are cheap.
A prompt set built from internal vocabulary measures how visible you are to people who already talk like you, which is a group that mostly consists of your own staff. It reliably produces flattering results and no useful information.
One argument tends to close the internal debate faster than any of the above. The audit produces a prompt set, and the prompt set is reusable by anyone you hire afterwards. It converts a vague brief into a specific one, which improves every proposal you receive and lets you compare suppliers on the same evidence rather than on the confidence of their pitch.
The consistent surprise is that niche trade publications and specialist directories appear far more often than general consumer press. A national newspaper mention is excellent for other reasons and frequently never appears in a citation list, while a sector publication nobody outside the industry has heard of turns up repeatedly.
What a Defensible Business Case Looks Like It states what cannot be measured. It reports inputs completed, with counts. It reports prompt set movement as fractions with visible run counts, split by intent. It includes the soft signals as anecdote clearly labelled as anecdote. It attributes every external statistic.
All three of those are worth knowing regardless of channel size, and two of them improve traditional search as a side effect. The cost of finding out is a few days. The cost of not knowing is discovering it in a quarter where the number has grown enough to hurt.
The Argument Against Waiting The usual counterargument is that assistant traffic is still small in most categories, which is often true. But the audit is not primarily about capturing that traffic. It is about finding out whether you are mechanically invisible, whether your identity is coherent, and which third party pages your category's answers are built from.
It is also worth doing while your category is boring. An audit run during a period of stability produces a clean baseline. One run in the middle of a competitor's campaign or immediately after a site migration measures the disruption rather than the position, and you will not know which you have unless you took the earlier reading.
Accept What Cannot Be Measured Start here, because every credible measurement framework in this channel begins with a subtraction. You cannot count how often you were named. No provider publishes it, and no third party tool can do more than sample.
That means an unlinked mention in a trade publication can be worth more here than a linked mention in a low quality outlet, which inverts the priority most digital public relations programmes were built on.
A page asking how much something costs that says pricing depends on your requirements has answered nothing, and it will not be cited because there is nothing to cite. A range with the variables named is a real answer and gets quoted.
Making Yourself Easy to Write About Journalists and analysts write from what they can find quickly. A press page carrying your canonical name, founding details, leadership with verifiable profiles, plain descriptions of what you do and concrete figures they can quote removes the friction that produces vague coverage.
Why Real Questions Beat Generated Ones Questions produced by keyword tools are smoothed. They use category vocabulary, they avoid awkward specifics, and they tend to be the questions everyone has already answered.
Review the whole set annually rather than continuously. Markets shift, product lines change and language moves, but an instrument revised every month is not an instrument. It is a series of unrelated measurements that happen to share a spreadsheet. how to get recommended by AI assistants
It does not contain a return on investment figure calculated from an assumed conversion rate applied to an estimated mention volume. That calculation looks rigorous and is a chain of guesses, and it will not survive the first person who asks where the first number came from.
Keeping It Honest Two disciplines keep this from decaying. First, the answers have to be checked by somebody who knows the business, because a writer working from notes will approximate a figure and an approximation published as fact is a liability you carry rather than they do.
Second, the questions have to keep coming from customers rather than from the content calendar. Within a few months the temptation appears to invent questions to fill a schedule, and invented questions produce exactly the marketing-in-disguise sections that get ignored.